Golf with a Gun
Sporting clays has often been referred to as “golf with a gun.” I’m not so sure how similar the sports are. Could you imagine Goethe or Beethoven playing golf? Neither could I, but I sure could see them hunting.
Today it is quite common to sojourn on a cast & blast outing where you can fish a little and do some shooting. I can see that. Grouse hunting with a break for some fly-fishing would be delightful. In New Brunswick I can heartily recommend following a woodcock hunt with some salmon fishing.
But golf also has poked its nose under the tent with the occasional golf & gun weekend. Golfing and gunning? Are they kindred? Is sporting clays really golf with a shotgun?
I live in a golfing community with more than 500 holes of golf at our beck and call. I even play the game, after a manner, so I thought that a comparison of golf and sporting clays might be in order.
Did you know that there are more shooters than golfers in the US? A 2006 study of sports participation showed 18,800,000 shooters, whereas the latest golf number I could find was only 13,200,000. To be fair, the almost 19 million shooters include rifle, pistol and archery as well as shotgun, but the numbers will cause a raised eyebrow or three at the 19th hole. Without archery’s 6,633,000, the numbers of golfers and firearms shooters are about even.
There are significant differences between sporting clays and golf. When shooters miss a clay, they usually just shake their heads and try harder next time. When golfers miss, they cry. Perhaps it has to do with wearing a uniform of pink trousers with little embroidered yellow whales.
In competitive shooting, the sure sign of a newbie is the “I” word. “I missed this” or “I muffed that,” etc. As Rhett said, “Frankly, Scarlet . . . .” As a shooter matures, he quickly realizes that no one else cares, so he shuts up. You never hear the good shots whine about their misses.
Not so in the self-centered realm of the little dimpled ball. I once suggested to my golfing foursome that the first-person singular personal pronoun be struck from our vocabulary for the morning’s round. There followed three hours of silence punctuated by grunted curses.
And then there is the equipment. A good shotgun is a work of art. It is comprised of carefully designed little bits and pieces that interact with amazing complexity. You can take it apart and fuss with it. You can lavish attention on it. A golf club is like a fork. It’s just there. Glaring at you. Smirking.
But golf does get some things right. Their handicap system is marvelous. Would that competitive sporting clays had such an arrangement instead of classes. Of course if that were the case, a normal person might actually win a shoot instead of the usual range owner’s son or teaching professional. That might cause other normal shooters to enter competitions and wrest even more victories from the sponsored shooters. Can’t have that, can we? Give trap credit for their 16-yard handicap setup too.
In defense of golf, you seldom hear the “It’s too hard” whine. Due to their excellent handicap system, golfers of all abilities play the same course. Not so with sporting clays shooters. In the big NSCA shoots the bulk of the entries are in M, AA and A classes even though there are far more NSCA members in B, C, D and E. The little guys don’t play registered because they feel they don’t have a reasonable chance. And of course they are right. Wouldn’t it be nice if sporting clays had as good a handicap system as golf? And don’t get me started on sporting clays permitting a pre-mounted gun.
There. I’ve finished venting. What are your thoughts? Boots off. Beer open.



Handicap system
I've thought for a long time that the golf handicap system is far superior to the sporting clays method.
Something that you forgot to mention is the way that some golfers will slam their club against the ground or throw it after a bad shot, I've yet to see a shooter do that with an expensive gun!
NSCA Handicap System
Wow, I was thinking the very same thing today. It would actually be pretty easy to do, and would certainly increase participation in Sporting Clays.
I don't have the foggiest idea whose ass we'd have to kiss to get it blessed. But statistically, it would be fairly easy.
Perhaps there is hope : )
NSCA Handicap System
Rule changes allowing pre-mounted gun came about shortly after NSCA became the governing body of Englich Sporting in this country. As the NSCA is an off-shoot of the NSSA it is natural that they would incorporate the pre-mounted gun rule jast as NSSA did many years ago. Both organizations just did not have the courage to properly enforce drop-stock shooting position mostly in deference to many of the top ranked shooters taking advantage of shoot personnel by circumventing the drop-stock shooting position that both Skeet and Sporting were originally designed around. No wonder that registered shooter numbers in Skeet and Sporting have nit a plateau or actually diminished. FITASC is still able to effectively enforce the low gun shooting requirement. If Skeet and Sporting would have enforced the rules for the game as orinally intended along with a handicap system that kept any entry money totally in the respective classes unless a shooter wished to play options that were not in his/her favor, the number of entries in most Skeet and Sporting shoots would be increasing. Instead, the sports were taken control of by top ranked shooters and industry sponsors to support their shooting and products. Both are supposed to be games. Corporate sponsors are very near sighted in promoting their products by providing freebies to a select few of the top rated shooters instead of having a great deal more shooters involved by using their products. There are now fewer lower classed NSSA and NSCA shooters who are willing to support the top ranked shooters by having to contribute to the class gun champions due to the usual piece of the entry fees that do not remain in class but are passed on to the gun champs as part of the compulsary entry fees.
"Boots off, beer open"
Please, Please drop the hackneyed phrase.