Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Gun Reviewing—A Tougher Job than You Think
Bruce Buck
Gun reviewers are in somewhat the same situation as the new husband whose zaftig bride asks, “Honey, does this dress make me look fat?” Sometimes you can’t win for losing.
Contrary to popular opinion, we don’t get free guns. We get to borrow them, fuss with them and then send them back. Some guns you’d really like to keep. Others get dropkicked into the UPS truck. You’d think a gunmaker might actually test-fire a review gun, but several times I’ve had to ask for a second sample to get one that actually worked. If your glass in life is half-full, you could say that the maker gets points for not cherry-picking the review guns. If your glass is half-empty, you might not be as kind.
And then there is the problem of personal opinion—mine and yours. I’ll bet we both have little things that just drive us crazy about some guns. But I’d be surprised if they were always the same little things. For example, I simply loathe the Schnabel Schnout, the Hapsburg lip of forends. Other perfectly reasonable people who might even vote the same way I do find them attractive. Neither of us is wrong; it’s just that I’m not in a business where I’m supposed to keep my opinions to myself.
Even things that you, I and most other sentient beings would agree on can cause trouble. Sometimes a major player produces a real dog, and I don’t mean a cute speckled pup. The heavily advertised clunker is too big a deal to ignore, so it gets some lethal ink. Truth may be an absolute defense in libel, but tell that to the enraged gunmaker’s flakmeister who calls your boss. That’s where my editors Ralph and Ed earn their pay catching the spears intended for me.
I admit that sometimes I just get carried away. I love the technical aspects of shotguns. To me, “bifurcated lumps” are not a starlet’s assets. The difference between a conical/parallel choke and one that is merely conical makes my day. Most people with a real life couldn’t care less.
So you see, this gun review stuff is not all peaches and cream. It’s really hard work. Now excuse me while I go and pack. Some gunmaker wants me to suffer through yet another bird hunt testing his gun. I should get a raise for all this grief, right?
Boots off. Beer open.
Posted on Tuesday, April 8, 2008 in Permalink

Email this page
Print this page
yahoo!
Comments
Shooting Sportsman’s Technoid Talk is a place where SSM readers can share their opinions with Gun Review Editor Bruce Buck. Bruce has been writing for SSM for more than 10 years, starting with book reviews and then gun reviews along with travel articles and product reviews. In addition to writing for SSM he currently has a column in ClayShooting USA. Before that he wrote for Clay Pigeon and Reload! His 35 years of shotgunning have included four trials for the US Olympic International Skeet team, numerous state championships in International Skeet and sporting clays plus a quarter-century of coaching experience, including two summers coaching at the US Olympic Training Center. An avid wingshooter, he has hunted birds in North, Central and South America; Europe and Africa. In this blog he will discuss technical shotgunning issues, shooting techniques and the latest developments in the world of fine shotguns & wingshooting.
Comments will be reviewed for content.
Reader Comments:
BRUCE I read your column every month, sometimes every week as it takes me a few nights to do it as I fall asleep (it is not the column but the real work I do that puts me there!) I bought an smith and wesson double based upon your review and the fact that I just wanted a double to impress my friends some day. Took it out of the box and wiped it down and put it in the safe. Nice gun. I shoot Ruger 20 guage over unders because lots of family and friends use them, they have automatic safties and occassionally someone drops one of the skeet pads. I have fired or let friends fire maybe thirty or fourty thousand rounds through them and they keep working so far. I think it would be nice to get a Kolar based on your latest review but they say don't use steel shot in it. OK. I think you are referring by clunkers to the never ending succession of Remington over and unders. I just saw the latest one. They should adopt call them "secundums" not "premiers" a la the Italian system. Gundevi
Good to be able to read an opinion from the other side of the rails.I enjoy your articles Bruce.
Bruce-
Continue to call it as you see it! We need honest reports rather than fluff to please potential advertisers, etc.
Hal Hare